CLAYTON COUNTY, Ga. — A federal jury has found Clayton County Sheriff Victor Hill guilty of violating civil rights of jail detainees.
He was found guilty on six of his seven charges, and not guilty on one of those charges.
The jury began deliberations Friday afternoon and have continued throughout the week until they reached a verdict this afternoon.
[DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]
Channel 2′s Audrey Washington spoke with juror number six, who was considered the holdout in the deliberations and asked if he felt justice was served.
“I believe justice was served,” he said. “We do not think he is a man of vicious intent. We believe there were violations and once there were violations, we believe they need to be addressed.”
Defense attorney Drew Findling told Washington that he is disappointed in the verdict, but plans to continue fighting.
“You can rest assured that this case will be appealed, and I can imagine, and we collectively can imagine, that like in other cases, the case will be reversed,” he said.
RELATED STORIES:
- Deliberations start over in Sheriff Victor Hill’s federal trial after juror excused
- Jurors deadlocked on several charges in sheriff’s federal civil rights trial
- Sheriff Victor Hill takes the stand for more than 3 hours in federal civil rights trial
- ‘It felt like a lifetime’: Detainee says Victor Hill tried to ‘teach him a lesson’
Federal prosecutors argue that no detainees were showing violent or uncontrollable behavior at the time they were restrained.
They say the sheriff based his use of the chair solely on behavior they displayed before they arrived at the jail.
In one case, prosecutors say Hill put a man in the chair for hours because the detainee previously used profanity against him, and the restraint was revenge. Jailers testified that at the time of restraint, the inmate was no problem.
[SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Under federal law, the chair can only be used if detainees are at risk of harming themselves or others.
Hill took the stand in his own defense last week, saying the chair is safe and that he was not aware of any inmate getting hurt in it.
One of the jurors was removed on Tuesday, and a second was questioned by the judge after being accused by fellow jurors of covering his eyes and ears while other jurors spoke.
Findling argued that Hill never did anything improper with the chair and likely prevented someone else from getting hurt by using it.
This browser does not support the video element.